- Price
- Not publicly listed
- Price
- Not publicly listed
Dornier Aries 2 vs KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III
Both the Dornier Aries 2 and the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III concentrate their energy at a focal point inside tissue, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Dornier Aries 2 uses EMSE wave generation; the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III uses electromagnetic. Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. FDA records located: for the Dornier Aries 2, no record located; for the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III, no record located.
Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.
Side by side
| Specification | FocusedDornier Aries 2 | FocusedKAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III |
|---|---|---|
Technology | ||
| Category | Focused systems | Focused systems |
| Wave generation | EMSEDornier's electromagnetic shock wave emitter | ElectromagneticOEM |
| Energy fieldWhere the peak energy lands | Peaks at a focal point | Peaks at a focal point |
| Technology as published | Focused low-intensity ESWT (EMSE) | Electromagnetic focused (OEM) |
| Stated use or positioning | Low-intensity ESWT | Not stated |
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another. | ||
| Energy flux densitymJ/mm² | Not published | 0.06–0.45 mJ/mm²on the EMFOCUS V |
| Energy adjustment | Dynamic depth and energyset at the push of a button; no levels published | Not published |
| FrequencyHz | Not published | 4–10 Hzmaximum, by model |
Depth and treatment fieldFocal depth, penetration and focus volume measure three different things. Compare like with like. | ||
| Focal depth | Not published | 0–65 mmset by the water level in the applicator |
Applicators and handpiece | ||
| Applicators and transmitters | Standard and I-Shape applicatorsno gel pads needed | 1 applicatorno gel pads; depth is set with water |
| Handpiece life | 2 million shocksstated system durability | About 500,000 shocksreplacement applicator listed at $699 |
| Applicator weight | 500 g | Not published |
| Preset protocols | Not published | Up to 29EMFOCUS V with the upgraded software; 11 as standard |
Size and setup | ||
| Unit weight | Not published | 30–53 kg (≈ 66.1–116.8 lb)EMFOCUS and EMFOCUS V 30 kg; EMFOCUS III 53 kg |
| Dimensions | Not published | 47 × 37 × 23 cmEMFOCUS; the larger EMFOCUS III measures 70 × 52 × 114 cm |
| Configuration | Transportable, compact consoletouch screen | Not published |
| Other published details | No water tank, degassing or routine coil replacementKoolShield | 12.1-inch touchscreenwater-circulation cooling with distilled or purified water |
Price and buying | ||
| Purchase price | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listedquote or OEM |
| Monthly lease | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listedquote or OEM |
| Warranty and guarantees | Not published | 1 year on the machine6 months on spare parts; the applicator is guaranteed for half a million shocks |
| Sales and service | Not published | No US officedistributors listed in Azerbaijan, Turkey, Thailand and Russia |
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product. | ||
| FDA record located | None located | None located |
| Other marks and claims | None noted | CE and MDD marking only |
Our notes | ||
| Where it stands out | Deep German medtech engineering heritage. | Lowest entry cost of the focused tier. |
| What to check | No current Aries 2 FDA number was located, and legacy lithotripsy records must not be cited in its place. | No US office, no device-specific FDA number. CE and MDD marking only. |
7 further fields have no published figure for either machine.
Dornier Aries 2 vs KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III: common questions
What is the difference between the Dornier Aries 2 and the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III?
Both the Dornier Aries 2 and the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III concentrate their energy at a focal point inside tissue, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Dornier Aries 2 uses EMSE wave generation; the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III uses electromagnetic. The Dornier Aries 2 is described as “Focused low-intensity ESWT (EMSE)”, the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III as “Electromagnetic focused (OEM)”.
Which is cheaper, the Dornier Aries 2 or the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III?
Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.
Are the Dornier Aries 2 and the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III FDA cleared?
FDA records located: for the Dornier Aries 2, no record located; for the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.
How do I choose between the Dornier Aries 2 and the KAPHA EMFOCUS / V / III?
Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.
More comparisons
Dornier Aries 2 vs
Still deciding?
Talk it through with our equipment team
Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.