STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra vs BTL-6000 FSWT

Both the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra and the BTL-6000 FSWT concentrate their energy at a focal point inside tissue, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra uses electromagnetic wave generation; the BTL-6000 FSWT uses electroacoustic. Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. FDA records located: for the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra, PMA P080028 (Chronic proximal plantar fasciitis in adults, after six or more months of failed conservative care) and 510(k) K202112 (Diabetic foot ulcers); for the BTL-6000 FSWT, no record located.

Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.

Side by side

SpecificationFocusedSTORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultraFocusedBTL-6000 FSWT
Technology
CategoryFocused systemsFocused systems
Wave generationElectromagneticcylindrical coil in the SEPIA handpieceElectroacoustic
Energy fieldWhere the peak energy landsPeaks at a focal pointPeaks at a focal point
Technology as publishedFocused electromagnetic (SEPIA)Focused electroacoustic
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another.
Energy flux densitymJ/mm²0.01–0.55 mJ/mm²with the standard SEPIA handpieceUp to 0.65 mJ/mm²
Energy per pulsemJNot published0.1–8.3 mJfrom 5 to 100 % intensity, per BTL's user manual
Energy adjustmentNot publishedIntensity 5–100 %
FrequencyHzNot published1–25 Hzfull intensity only up to 10 Hz
Depth and treatment fieldFocal depth, penetration and focus volume measure three different things. Compare like with like.
Focal depth0–65 mmset with the stand-offs supplied15–45 mmfocal point, set with the coupling pads
Maximum penetrationUp to 125 mmUp to 65 mm
Focus volumeA volume, not a depthNot published5 × 5 × 35 mmfocal zone
Applicators and handpiece
Applicators and transmittersSEPIA focused handpiece with stand-offsoptional C-ACTOR handpiece reaches 0.03–1.24 mJ/mm²One applicator with 3 coupling padsthe pads set the treatment depth
Handpiece lifeNot publishedUp to 3 million shocksguaranteed
Applicator weightNot publishedUp to 880 gwithout cable or coupling pad
Preset protocolsNot published27plus user-defined protocols
Size and setup
Unit weightNot published30 kg (≈ 66.1 lb)without the trolley
DimensionsNot published580 × 980 × 550 mm
ConfigurationTabletop T-TOP consoleoptional 10-inch touch screen; upgradeable to the DUOLITH SD1 TOWER »ultra«Upright unit on castorstouchscreen on the applicator
Other published detailsFrequency and energy set on the handpiececoil designed for simple replacement8.4-inch colour touchscreensequence and single-therapy modes
Price and buying
Purchase priceNot publicly listedNot publicly listed
Monthly leaseNot publicly listedNot publicly listed
Sales and serviceSTORZ MEDICAL America, Kennesaw, Georgiaexclusive North American distributorGlobal training and support network
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product.
FDA record locatedPMA P080028 · 510(k) K202112None located
Indication as worded in the recordPMA P080028: Chronic proximal plantar fasciitis in adults, after six or more months of failed conservative care; 510(k) K202112: Diabetic foot ulcersNo record to quote
Our notes
Where it stands outThe strongest FDA paper trail in the reviewed set.Global training and support network.
What to checkThose records are configuration-specific and indication-specific. They are not a blanket clearance for the DUOLITH line.No US-specific 510(k) was found on the pages reviewed.

6 further fields have no published figure for either machine.

STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra vs BTL-6000 FSWT: common questions

What is the difference between the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra and the BTL-6000 FSWT?

Both the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra and the BTL-6000 FSWT concentrate their energy at a focal point inside tissue, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra uses electromagnetic wave generation; the BTL-6000 FSWT uses electroacoustic. The STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra is described as “Focused electromagnetic (SEPIA)”, the BTL-6000 FSWT as “Focused electroacoustic”.

Which is cheaper, the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra or the BTL-6000 FSWT?

Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.

Are the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra and the BTL-6000 FSWT FDA cleared?

FDA records located: for the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra, PMA P080028 (Chronic proximal plantar fasciitis in adults, after six or more months of failed conservative care) and 510(k) K202112 (Diabetic foot ulcers); for the BTL-6000 FSWT, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.

How do I choose between the STORZ DUOLITH SD1 T-TOP ultra and the BTL-6000 FSWT?

Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.

More comparisons

Still deciding?

Talk it through with our equipment team

Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.

Request a consultation
↑