- Price
- Not publicly listed
- Price
- Not publicly listed
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs STORZ MASTERPULS ONE
Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic wave generation; the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE uses pneumatic. Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE, no record located.
Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.
Side by side
| Specification | RadialZimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro | RadialSTORZ MASTERPULS ONE |
|---|---|---|
Technology | ||
| Category | Radial pressure wave | Radial pressure wave |
| Wave generation | Electromagnetic ballisticcompressor-free | Pneumaticballistic |
| Energy fieldWhere the peak energy lands | Peaks at the applicator surface | Peaks at the applicator surface |
| Technology as published | Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial | Pneumatic ballistic radial |
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another. | ||
| Energy per pulsemJ | 60–185 mJin 10 mJ steps; Zimmer compares the range to 1–5 bar | Not published |
| Pressurebar | Not published | Up to 2.7 bareffective |
| Energy adjustment | Not published | 6 energy levels |
| FrequencyHz | 1–22 Hz | 6–18 Hz |
Applicators and handpiece | ||
| Applicators and transmitters | 6, 15 and 25 mm headschanged without tools; the enPuls 2.0 ships two 15 mm heads | SPARROW handpiece with the D20-S transmitterR15, C15, DI15 and D20-T transmitters optional |
| Handpiece life | 2 million pulseshandpiece warranty | Not published |
| Applicator weight | About 1.87 lbhandpiece, with cable | Not published |
| Preset protocols | 7 presetscustomizable | Not published |
Size and setup | ||
| Unit weight | 6 lb (≈ 2.7 kg)enPuls 2.0, without handpiece | 9.8 kg (≈ 21.6 lb) |
| Dimensions | 12.7 × 9.3 × 5.1 inenPuls 2.0, L × W × H; the enPuls Pro is 7.9 × 13.8 × 11.8 in | 289 × 238 × 310 mm |
| Configuration | Compressor-free, light chassisfoot switch triggers pulses | Compact starter unithandpiece serviceable by the user |
| Other published details | 7-inch touchscreen on the enPuls 2.0, 12-inch on the enPuls Prothe Pro weighs 8.4 lb, runs two handpieces and adds a visual analogue pain scale | Snap-in handpiece connectiondamped handpiece; optional handpiece colours |
Price and buying | ||
| Purchase price | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listed |
| Monthly lease | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listed |
| Warranty and guarantees | 2 million-pulse handpiece warranty | Not published |
| Sales and service | Strong direct US service channelZimmer MedizinSystems, Irvine, California | STORZ MEDICAL America, Kennesaw, Georgiaexclusive North American distributor |
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product. | ||
| FDA record located | None located | None locatedrecords on other configurations from this manufacturer do not cover this model |
Our notes | ||
| Where it stands out | Strong direct US service channel and a light chassis. | Part of the most FDA-documented manufacturer family reviewed. |
| What to check | No device-specific 510(k) number was found. | No price transparency, and no device-specific record for this model. |
9 further fields have no published figure for either machine.
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs STORZ MASTERPULS ONE: common questions
What is the difference between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE?
Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic wave generation; the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE uses pneumatic. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro is described as “Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial”, the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE as “Pneumatic ballistic radial”.
Which is cheaper, the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro or the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE?
Neither publishes a purchase price, so both need a written quote. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.
Are the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE FDA cleared?
FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.
How do I choose between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the STORZ MASTERPULS ONE?
Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.
More comparisons
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs
Still deciding?
Talk it through with our equipment team
Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.