Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE

Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. Both use electromagnetic ballistic wave generation. Only the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE has a published purchase figure ($5,999–$9,999); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE, no record located.

Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.

Side by side

SpecificationRadialZimmer enPuls 2.0 / ProValue tierOceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE
Technology
CategoryRadial pressure waveValue and direct-import tier
Wave generationElectromagnetic ballisticcompressor-freeElectromagnetic ballisticcompressor-free radial, per the specification table
Energy fieldWhere the peak energy landsPeaks at the applicator surfacePeaks at the applicator surface
Technology as publishedCompressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radialClinical and at-home shockwave and ultrasonic
Stated use or positioningNot statedClinical useOceanus also sells an in-home device, the PhysioLITE III
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another.
Energy per pulsemJ60–185 mJin 10 mJ steps; Zimmer compares the range to 1–5 bar60–185 mJequivalent to 1–5 bar, as published
FrequencyHz1–22 Hz1–22 Hz
Applicators and handpiece
Applicators and transmitters6, 15 and 25 mm headschanged without tools; the enPuls 2.0 ships two 15 mm heads6, 15 and 25 mm heads
Handpiece life2 million pulseshandpiece warranty4,000,000 pulsesPhysioPRO warranty minimum; PhysioPRO II 2,000,000
Applicator weightAbout 1.87 lbhandpiece, with cableNot published
Preset protocols7 presetscustomizable7 presetsplus more than 25 illustrated treatment recommendations
Size and setup
Unit weight6 lb (≈ 2.7 kg)enPuls 2.0, without handpiece2.07 kg (≈ 4.6 lb)controller unit only
Dimensions12.7 × 9.3 × 5.1 inenPuls 2.0, L × W × H; the enPuls Pro is 7.9 × 13.8 × 11.8 in12 × 9.5 × 5 inL × W × H
ConfigurationCompressor-free, light chassisfoot switch triggers pulsesTabletop controller with therapy handlealuminum carrying case; the PhysioPRO II is controlled from a phone or tablet app
Other published details7-inch touchscreen on the enPuls 2.0, 12-inch on the enPuls Prothe Pro weighs 8.4 lb, runs two handpieces and adds a visual analogue pain scale7.0-inch colour touchscreenPhysioPRO; 4 burst modes
Price and buying
Purchase priceNot publicly listed$5,999–$9,999PhysioPRO II $5,999 · PhysioPRO $9,999
Monthly leaseNot publicly listed$500 per monthadvertised, factory direct
Warranty and guarantees2 million-pulse handpiece warrantyThree years on the controller, one year on accessoriesplus a 30-day money-back guarantee; the company page states a one-year guarantee on all products
Sales and serviceStrong direct US service channelZimmer MedizinSystems, Irvine, CaliforniaFactory-direct leaseonline store, financing and dealers
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product.
FDA record locatedNone locatedNone located
Other marks and claimsNone notedAdvertises “FDA registered”a facility registration, not a clearance
Our notes
Where it stands outStrong direct US service channel and a light chassis.An aggressive lease entry point.
What to checkNo device-specific 510(k) number was found.The site advertises “FDA registered”, which is a facility registration and is not the same as clearance. Verify model-specific labelling.

9 further fields have no published figure for either machine.

Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE: common questions

What is the difference between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE?

Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. Both use electromagnetic ballistic wave generation. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro is described as “Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial”, the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE as “Clinical and at-home shockwave and ultrasonic”.

Which is cheaper, the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro or the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE?

Only the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE has a published purchase figure ($5,999–$9,999); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. Monthly figures: Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, not publicly listed; Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE, $500 per month. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.

Are the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE FDA cleared?

FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.

How do I choose between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Oceanus PhysioPRO / II / LITE?

Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.

More comparisons

Still deciding?

Talk it through with our equipment team

Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.

Request a consultation
↑