- Price
- Not publicly listed
- Purchase
- $17,850
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs Gymna ShockMaster 500
Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Gymna ShockMaster 500 put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic wave generation; the Gymna ShockMaster 500 uses pneumatic. Only the Gymna ShockMaster 500 has a published purchase figure ($17,850 at one US seller, listed sold out); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the Gymna ShockMaster 500, no record located.
Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.
Side by side
| Specification | RadialZimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro | RadialGymna ShockMaster 500 |
|---|---|---|
Technology | ||
| Category | Radial pressure wave | Radial pressure wave |
| Wave generation | Electromagnetic ballisticcompressor-free | Pneumaticbuilt-in oil compressor |
| Energy fieldWhere the peak energy lands | Peaks at the applicator surface | Peaks at the applicator surface |
| Technology as published | Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial | Pneumatic radial |
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another. | ||
| Energy per pulsemJ | 60–185 mJin 10 mJ steps; Zimmer compares the range to 1–5 bar | Not published |
| Pressurebar | Not published | 0.3–5 bareffective bar, in 0.1 bar steps |
| FrequencyHz | 1–22 Hz | 0.5–21 Hz35 Hz with V-Actor |
Depth and treatment fieldFocal depth, penetration and focus volume measure three different things. Compare like with like. | ||
| Maximum penetration | Not published | 0–60 mmDeep Impact applicator; 0–40 mm with the beam applicator |
Applicators and handpiece | ||
| Applicators and transmitters | 6, 15 and 25 mm headschanged without tools; the enPuls 2.0 ships two 15 mm heads | Beam, Deep Impact and D-Actor 20 mmstandard set; more are optional |
| Handpiece life | 2 million pulseshandpiece warranty | Revision prompt every 1.25 million shocks4 revisions included |
| Applicator weight | About 1.87 lbhandpiece, with cable | About 500 gRSW handpiece |
| Preset protocols | 7 presetscustomizable | Over 90pre-programmed settings |
Size and setup | ||
| Unit weight | 6 lb (≈ 2.7 kg)enPuls 2.0, without handpiece | 65 kg (≈ 143.3 lb)complete; the latest datasheet says 72 kg |
| Dimensions | 12.7 × 9.3 × 5.1 inenPuls 2.0, L × W × H; the enPuls Pro is 7.9 × 13.8 × 11.8 in | 102 × 58 × 57 cmH × L × W, on its trolley |
| Configuration | Compressor-free, light chassisfoot switch triggers pulses | Trolley unit with a built-in oil compressor7-inch touchscreen |
| Other published details | 7-inch touchscreen on the enPuls 2.0, 12-inch on the enPuls Prothe Pro weighs 8.4 lb, runs two handpieces and adds a visual analogue pain scale | Two handpiece connectionssoft start ramps up from 1 bar; software updates by USB |
Price and buying | ||
| Purchase price | Not publicly listed | $17,850at one US seller, listed sold out |
| Monthly lease | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listed |
| Warranty and guarantees | 2 million-pulse handpiece warranty | Not published |
| Sales and service | Strong direct US service channelZimmer MedizinSystems, Irvine, California | US direct channel unclearno US dealer listed; the nearest is in Ontario, Canada |
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product. | ||
| FDA record located | None located | None located |
Our notes | ||
| Where it stands out | Strong direct US service channel and a light chassis. | Very large preset protocol library. |
| What to check | No device-specific 510(k) number was found. | US direct channel is unclear and no FDA number was found. |
9 further fields have no published figure for either machine.
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs Gymna ShockMaster 500: common questions
What is the difference between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Gymna ShockMaster 500?
Both the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Gymna ShockMaster 500 put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic wave generation; the Gymna ShockMaster 500 uses pneumatic. The Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro is described as “Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial”, the Gymna ShockMaster 500 as “Pneumatic radial”.
Which is cheaper, the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro or the Gymna ShockMaster 500?
Only the Gymna ShockMaster 500 has a published purchase figure ($17,850 at one US seller, listed sold out); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.
Are the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Gymna ShockMaster 500 FDA cleared?
FDA records located: for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located; for the Gymna ShockMaster 500, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.
How do I choose between the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro and the Gymna ShockMaster 500?
Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.
More comparisons
Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro vs
Still deciding?
Talk it through with our equipment team
Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.