- Purchase
- $16,709.85
- Lease
- $380 per month
- Price
- Not publicly listed
Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW vs Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro
Both the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW and the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW uses pneumatic wave generation; the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic. Only the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW has a published purchase figure ($16,709.85 estimate); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. FDA records located: for the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW, an establishment listing only, which is not a clearance; for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located.
Specs and prices are estimates based on publicly available data as of September 2026. Confirm details with the manufacturer or seller before you buy.
Side by side
| Specification | RadialChattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW | RadialZimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro |
|---|---|---|
Technology | ||
| Category | Radial pressure wave | Radial pressure wave |
| Wave generation | Pneumatic | Electromagnetic ballisticcompressor-free |
| Energy fieldWhere the peak energy lands | Peaks at the applicator surface | Peaks at the applicator surface |
| Technology as published | Portable pneumatic radial pressure wave | Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial |
Energy outputPressure in bar, energy flux density in mJ/mm² and energy per pulse in mJ are different quantities. A figure in one row never stands in for another. | ||
| Energy flux densitymJ/mm² | 0.38–0.48 mJ/mm²with the standard transmitters | Not published |
| Energy per pulsemJ | Not published | 60–185 mJin 10 mJ steps; Zimmer compares the range to 1–5 bar |
| Pressurebar | 1–5 barin 0.1 bar steps | Not published |
| FrequencyHz | 1–21 Hzthe maximum falls to 12 Hz at 5 bar | 1–22 Hz |
Depth and treatment fieldFocal depth, penetration and focus volume measure three different things. Compare like with like. | ||
| Maximum penetration | 0–50 mmwith the standard D20-S transmitter; 0–35 mm with the Ro40 | Not published |
Applicators and handpiece | ||
| Applicators and transmitters | D20-S and Ro40 transmittersoptional V-ACTOR vibration handpiece | 6, 15 and 25 mm headschanged without tools; the enPuls 2.0 ships two 15 mm heads |
| Handpiece life | About 5 million shocksexpected service life; overhaul about every million | 2 million pulseshandpiece warranty |
| Applicator weight | 510 gR-SW handpiece | About 1.87 lbhandpiece, with cable |
| Preset protocols | Not published | 7 presetscustomizable |
Size and setup | ||
| Unit weight | 8.2 kg (≈ 18.1 lb)control device | 6 lb (≈ 2.7 kg)enPuls 2.0, without handpiece |
| Dimensions | 490 × 290 × 400 mmW × H × D | 12.7 × 9.3 × 5.1 inenPuls 2.0, L × W × H; the enPuls Pro is 7.9 × 13.8 × 11.8 in |
| Configuration | Portable, built-in compressor | Compressor-free, light chassisfoot switch triggers pulses |
| Other published details | LED display for pressure, frequency and pulse countpulses triggered from a button on the handpiece | 7-inch touchscreen on the enPuls 2.0, 12-inch on the enPuls Prothe Pro weighs 8.4 lb, runs two handpieces and adds a visual analogue pain scale |
Price and buying | ||
| Purchase price | $16,709.85estimate | Not publicly listed |
| Monthly lease | $380 per monthestimate | Not publicly listed |
| Priced accessories | Ro40 D-Actor® ‘Beam’ transmitter, $1,200; 9 Transmitter Set in carrying case, $7,400 | Not published |
| Warranty and guarantees | Two yearshandpiece two years or three million shocks; transmitters one year or one million shocks | 2 million-pulse handpiece warranty |
| Sales and service | Purchase or lease through Shockwave Source | Strong direct US service channelZimmer MedizinSystems, Irvine, California |
Regulatory recordRecord types and numbers exactly as located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another product. | ||
| FDA record located | Establishment listing onlynot a model-specific clearance | None located |
| Indication as worded in the record | Listing only. Not a model-specific clearance and carries no indication. | No record to quote |
Our notes | ||
| Where it stands out | The most portable Chattanooga option, with published pricing. | Strong direct US service channel and a light chassis. |
| What to check | Same FDA listing caveat as the RPW2: a listing, not a clearance. | No device-specific 510(k) number was found. |
6 further fields have no published figure for either machine.
Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW vs Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro: common questions
What is the difference between the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW and the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro?
Both the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW and the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro put their peak energy at the applicator surface, so they are built for the same clinical job and compare fairly. The Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW uses pneumatic wave generation; the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro uses electromagnetic ballistic. The Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW is described as “Portable pneumatic radial pressure wave”, the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro as “Compressor-free electromagnetic ballistic radial”.
Which is cheaper, the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW or the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro?
Only the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW has a published purchase figure ($16,709.85 estimate); the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro's price is not published. Monthly figures: Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW, $380 per month; Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, not publicly listed. Prices change and estimates are not quotes, so confirm both in writing.
Are the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW and the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro FDA cleared?
FDA records located: for the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW, an establishment listing only, which is not a clearance; for the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro, no record located. A record covers one configuration and one indication, and never transfers to another model, so check it against the exact configuration you are quoted.
How do I choose between the Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW and the Zimmer enPuls 2.0 / Pro?
Start with the clinical job, then ask both vendors for the same five things in writing: the exact model, revision, and which accessories are included at that price; contract term, APR, total payments, and the buyout option at the end; handpiece and consumable life, and what a replacement costs; warranty coverage and US service turnaround time; the exact FDA clearance number and the current labelling for the configuration being quoted.
More comparisons
Chattanooga Intelect Mobile 2 RPW vs
Still deciding?
Talk it through with our equipment team
Tell us about your practice and caseload. We will help you weigh the options and send lease and purchase estimates for the machines we sell.